Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Owu Kingdom

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) -- Dane2007 ^talk 21:13, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Owu Kingdom[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails WP:GNG and does not have reliable source according to WP:RELIABLE Jamzy4 (talk) 20:24, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 August 26. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:41, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
And what about the sources found by the Google Books and Scholar searches spoon-fed by the nomination process? Those links are there for a reason. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 20:59, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 21:00, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 21:00, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep - topic beats WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND as it stretches to Kwara, Osun and Ogun States per The Nation. Reputable people including Ibikunle Amosun, Samuel Adegboyega and Olusegun Obasanjo per City People Magazine. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 22:09, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment@Jamzy4: make researches first per WP:GD before listing articles for AfD. This already looks like another failed consecutive AfD nomination. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 22:09, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 22:09, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 22:09, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

keep, needs sources on the page, and fast. But this is definitely meets GNG.--Prisencolin (talk) 03:40, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
keep Owu Kingdom is clearly notable, based on all the books which include extensive information about it. Article needs a huge amount of improvement but that is not a valid reason for deletion. CrispyGlover (talk) 20:14, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.